Inflation Explained: Why Prices Rise, Why It Turned Political, and What It Does to Your Money
Inflation explained clearly: why prices rise, what caused the recent surge, and how inflation affects your wages, savings, rent, and mortgage.
Inflation is the quiet tax you don’t vote for: prices move first, paychecks move later, and the gap gets billed to your future.
At its core, inflation is the rate at which prices rise over time—meaning the same money buys less.
In the 2020s, inflation stopped being a background statistic and became a geopolitical stress test. The tension was simple: governments needed growth and stability after the pandemic, but the world economy was hit by supply shocks, energy shocks, and a sudden fight over who bears the cost.
What follows is the clean chain of cause and effect: how inflation forms, why it spiked when it did, why central banks reached for interest rates even when the problem started elsewhere, and how it filters into your rent, mortgage, savings, and wages.
The story turns on how scarcity, power, and expectations fight over the price of everyday life.
Key Points
Inflation is a broad rise in prices over time that reduces purchasing power; it is usually measured through a basket-of-goods index like CPI.
The decisive starting point was the 2020–2021 reopening shock: demand snapped back faster than supply chains could recover.
A major turning point was the 2022 energy and food surge tied to the Russia–Ukraine war’s spillovers through commodity markets and logistics.
The biggest constraint was that interest-rate policy can cool spending, but it cannot instantly repair shortages, rebuild supply capacity, or undo geopolitical shocks.
The hinge decision was central banks choosing to prioritise inflation credibility—raising rates to slow demand and prevent high inflation from embedding in wages, prices, and contracts.
What changed most was the cost of money: borrowing got more expensive and risk got repriced across mortgages, business investment, and government debt.
What endured was exposure: households spending a larger share on essentials (energy, food, rent) felt the squeeze first and longest.
The clearest legacy signal is a world more comfortable with higher rates, more sensitive to supply shocks, and more willing to treat energy and trade as security issues.
Background
Before inflation became the headline, the global system was already running hot: tightly optimised supply chains, energy markets that transmit shocks instantly, and politics that rewarded cheap credit and steady consumption.
Then the pandemic scrambled the baseline. Production capacity was interrupted, shipping and inventories were distorted, and labor markets re-sorted in uneven ways across countries and sectors. When demand returned, the world discovered it had built efficiency without much slack.
The major actors were not only governments and central banks. Energy exporters, shipping networks, sanctioning coalitions, and firms controlling key inputs all gained leverage because they could raise prices faster than others could substitute away.
That set the stage for inflation to become less about one country overheating and more about the price of bottlenecks being fought over globally. Next came the moment that turned pressure into a cycle.
The Trigger
The decisive trigger was the collision between post-pandemic rebound and constrained supply—followed by a second shock that hit the most geopolitically sensitive inputs: energy and food.
In the UK framing, recent high inflation was driven largely by higher costs: supply shortages after Covid, labor tightness, and then the invasion of Ukraine amplifying commodity pressures.
Once essential inputs rise, businesses don’t need a conspiracy to lift prices. They pass costs through where demand is still holding, and the rest of the economy rearranges around the new price level—especially if households and firms start to expect future increases and behave accordingly. Central banks cannot manufacture gas or unclog ports, but they can reduce demand enough to change pricing power.
That trade—slower growth now to avoid entrenched inflation later—defined the next phase.
The Timeline
Phase 1: 2020—Shock, Stabilisation, and Hidden Distortions
Power on the ground looked like emergency economics: keep firms alive, keep households solvent, keep the financial system functioning.
The mechanism was blunt stabilisation. Policy support and ultra-low rates helped prevent a deep collapse, but they also kept demand capacity intact while supply capacity was impaired, setting up an imbalance once reopening began.
The carry-over was fragile: inflation did not need to be caused by money printing to emerge; it only needed demand to recover faster than supply could. The reopening would reveal the gap.
Phase 2: 2021—Demand Returns Faster Than Supply Can Move
This was the classic bottleneck moment: goods demand surged, logistics strained, and scarcity gained pricing power.
The constraint was physical—container capacity, port throughput, inventories, and the time it takes to rebuild production lines. These are geopolitical in practice because disruption in one node transmits globally through trade and shipping.
For households, this is when “a bit more expensive” turns into “why is everything up at once?”—because prices rise across categories that share the same transport, energy, and input costs. The system was primed for a bigger shock.
Phase 3: 2022—Energy and Food Become the Transmission Belt
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine acted like a lever on global prices: commodity markets repriced, supply chains rerouted, and uncertainty raised the cost of moving essentials across borders.
The spillover hit fast because energy and food sit underneath everything: heating, transport, fertiliser, manufacturing, and household budgets. In advanced economies, the surge in energy and food prices made the cost-of-living squeeze most severe for households spending a larger share on necessities.
Once essentials climb, inflation stops being a policy debate and becomes a legitimacy problem. That forced central banks toward the hinge.
Phase 4: 2022–2023—The Hinge: Central Banks Choose Credibility Over Comfort
Mandatory hinge: Central banks tightened policy—raising rates to slow spending and reduce inflation pressure—because letting high inflation linger risks embedding it into wage bargaining, pricing decisions, and expectations.
Alternatives were limited. If a country tries to look through inflation while others tighten, its currency can weaken, imported prices can rise, and credibility can erode. If it tightens too aggressively, unemployment can jump and debt stress can surface. That is the narrow corridor policymakers tried to walk.
For you, this is where inflation mutates: some prices keep rising, but the bigger change is the cost of borrowing—mortgages, credit, and business finance reprice upward. The next phase was about persistence.
Phase 5: 2024–Present—Disinflation, But a More Jittery Price System
Inflation can slow without the world feeling cheap again. A lower inflation rate means prices are rising more slowly, not that they fall back to pre-shock levels.
The capacity shift is psychological and financial: higher rates reshape housing markets, consumer demand, and investment, while geopolitics keeps supply-side risk alive through energy policy, sanctions architecture, and supply-chain de-risking.
This is why the inflation story lingers even after headline numbers cool: the price level reset, the money-cost reset, and the trust reset do not unwind on the same schedule.
Consequences
Immediately, inflation redistributes. Debtors can benefit if incomes rise and the real value of debt erodes, but only if borrowing costs don’t reset faster than cashflow. Savers lose if interest paid on deposits lags behind prices, and low-income households take the hardest hit because essentials dominate their spending.
Second-order effects are where the geopolitics lives: tighter monetary policy can strain public finances, widen political polarisation, and increase pressure to secure energy and critical inputs through industrial policy, friend-shoring, and tougher trade rules.
For households, the durable impact is not just higher prices, but a world where rates, rents, and job security can swing harder when shocks hit. That feeds directly into the next blind spot.
What Most People Miss
Most people argue about inflation as if it is one thing. It’s not. There is goods inflation driven by bottlenecks, energy-driven inflation that cascades through everything, and services inflation tied to labor costs and domestic capacity—and they cool at different speeds.
That matters because central banks mainly steer demand through interest rates. This can slow broad inflation, but it is a rough tool against supply-side spikes—meaning policy can feel like it is punishing borrowers for problems created by shortages and geopolitics.
Once you see inflation as a mix of shocks plus expectations, the “why doesn’t it just go back to normal?” question stops being mysterious.
What Endured
Geography kept its vote: energy and commodity flows still move through chokepoints and concentrated producers.
Domestic politics stayed decisive: voters punish price rises faster than they reward long-term stability, so governments hunt for short-term relief even when it risks longer-term inflation.
Institutional limits remained: central banks can influence financial conditions, but they cannot create supply, undo wars, or instantly expand productive capacity.
And households stayed exposed: the closer your budget is to the essentials, the less choice inflation gives you. Those constraints shape what policy can plausibly do next.
Disputed and Uncertain Points
Analysts still debate how much of the 2021–2023 inflation burst was demand-driven versus supply-driven, and how that mix varied across countries and time.
There is disagreement about the extent to which inflation risked becoming entrenched through expectations and wage setting, versus cooling naturally as shocks faded.
The effectiveness and side effects of rapid rate hikes remain contested: some view tightening as necessary credibility protection, others see avoidable damage given supply origins.
The durability of future inflation depends on geopolitics—energy security, sanctions enforcement, supply-chain redesign—where outcomes are harder to model and easier to shock.
Legacy
Inflation’s legacy is not only a higher price level. It is a political and strategic shift: energy policy is treated more like national security, supply resilience is prioritised over pure efficiency, and central banks are more willing to hold tighter conditions longer to defend credibility.
For ordinary households, the practical legacy is a sharper trade: if inflation returns, rates can rise quickly; if growth weakens, rate cuts may not restore affordability because the level of prices and housing costs has already reset.
Subscribe on Spotify, or explore more articles for more compelling insight.
